OVEC's home page features links to environmental news on the web
Archive list of "E"- Notes newsletters

Click links below to read articles online, or try the PDF version to view or print an exact replica of the paper newsletter. 

December 2008
Contents

Constant Blasting from Strip Mines Frustrates, Angers WV Community
Shirley Stewart Burns Addresses Annual Meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists, October 2008
MTR Scars the Human Heart
Passages: A Beloved Friend
Temporary Stay of Execution for Coal River Mountain
Coping with Climate Change
CLEAN's Role in Campaign
Third Blessing on Gauley Mountain
Gauley Mtn. Close to Home for Me
Save Gauley Mountain Petition
Drawn and Quartered: State Two Bits and DEP Fits

Boone County Updates: Take A Different Kind of Sunday Drive - See Mountain Massacre Up Close and Personal As It Destroys Our State

There's Irony for You!

Youth in Action: WV Youth Action League on the Rise, Setting Goals
Sludge Safety Project Readies Variety of Efforts for 2009 WV Legislative Session
Educating Your Legislators A Key to Getting Action on Sludge Issues
What Does Sludge Safety Project Want for the 2009 Legislative Session?
Communities Unite for Water Testing Training
Newspapers and Bloggers Across the Land Editorialize Against Buffer Zone Change
Majority of West Virginians Ready for Clean, Green Energy, Multiple Statewide Surveys Show
Mingo County Group Hosts Green Jobs Now Picnic
Wind Working Group Meeting
Green Power a Real Threat to King Coal
Clean Elections and the Courts - It's Hard to Keep Up
Obama Expected to Tighten Coal Mining Regulations, Set CO Limits
Faith in Action: Having Faith, Taking Power at Public Policy Forum

Roane County Meditation Group Visits Kayford Mountain

Many Suffer As A Result of Illegal Mining
People Magazine Features OVEC Board Member in Lengthy Article
OVECs Cemetery Protection Campaign
Federal Court Hears Corps, Industry Appeal of Our Major Victory
From The Ground Up
Judge Blocks Permit for Clay-Nicholas Co. Coal Mine: Fola Coal Can Continue Mining in Interim, Though 
So What Did We Win? Another Cork in the Permit Bottle!
Bioneers 2008 - Revolution in the Heart of Nature
Organizing Toward Clean Water Victory in Prenter! 
Survey Says! Poll Shows Nationwide Opposition to Mountaintop Removal
Mount Union College Students Ponder Destruction and Creation
An Open Letter To Bayer
... and the Dead Shall Rest in Peace for All of Eternity (Except in southern West Virginia)
Miscellany


For viewing the PDF version of the newsletter

 
Winds of Change Newsletter, December 2008     See sidebar for table of contents

Clean Elections and the Courts - It's Hard to Keep Up

 
Not a good campaign finance model
Not a good campaign finance model

Keeping up with court decisions on campaign finance law is a formidable task. Our national partners at Public Campaign are always helpful in educating us and providing information the Clean Elections coalition needs.

On Oct. 16, OVEC staff member and Coalition coordinator Carol Warren and WV Citizen Actions Julie Archer took part in a national meeting in Washington, D.C. The discussion centered around the June 2008 Supreme Court decision overturning the "millionaire rule," Davis vs. Federal Election Commission.

Implications, if any, for public financing are still unclear, though it must be noted that the Davis decision did not include rulings on any matters specific to public financing.

In fact, Buckley v. Valeo, the landmark case that dealt with public financing reforms, was not called into question. The Davis decision dealt with two candidates, both of whom were privately funded, actively raising money and free to spend their own personal wealth.

The court ruled that allowing one candidates contribution limit to be tripled while the other candidates was not raised because of his greater personal wealth constituted unequal treatment.

There are certainly good reasons to believe that the court would look differently upon a situation in which there are two candidates, one of whom has opted for public funding and the other who has not.

Publicly funded candidates must agree at the outset to spending limits, not taking private contributions and other requirements.

Buckley suggests there are a number of "compelling state interests" in allowing public campaign financing programs. These are related to decreasing the possibility of and opportunity for corruption and buying of influence, and to fostering more participation in the electoral process by a diverse group of candidates.

And because of these compelling interests, advocates for public financing plan to forge ahead with their work at all levels, including the recent Fair Elections Now Act introduced in the United States Congress. For more information on the coalition activities in West Virginia, please visit our website www.wvoter-owned.org.

 

   Smart Counter Details   OVEC Home   Issues   Contact   Join   Site Map