Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition
Archive list of "E"- Notes newsletters

Click links below to read articles online, or try the PDF version to view or print an exact replica of the paper newsletter. 

Contents

Sludged Sick: Telling Our Stories in the State Capitol
New Court Order Sought to Block Three More MTR Permits in WV
Not Just Any Thursday
Somethings in the Water
The TRUE Costs of Coal
Buffalo Creek: It Should Never Have Happened
Living With Sludge, Living With Fear
Redefining Mine Safety - Inside and Outside the Mines
Book on MTR's Horrors Reviewed

Proposed Campaign Financing Act Would Mean Clean Elections in WV

Voter Beware: Watching the Paper Trail Vital to Make Sure YOUR Vote Counts
WV Senator Pushes Publicly Funded Campaigns Starting With 2008 Election
Coal Has Given Millions to Candidates, Report Says
Injecting Coal Wastes Underground Harmful, Not Well Regulated in WV
On the Scene at Sago
The Toll from Coal
A Discredited Regime
The Worst Environmental President in US History
Our Voices Are Being Heard Nationally and Internationally!
Net Metering: Grassroots Energy Generation for Everyone
Strange Questions: When Just Listening Can Be Viewed as A Threat
Chilling Dissent: FBI Collecting Research Reports on Enviro Groups
Intact Forests Worth TRILLIONS

We Cant Wait on Warming, Bushs Do-Nothing Policy Unacceptable

Global Warming: Seven Hard Realities for Americans
Almost LEVEL, West Virginia
Sustainable Development: Help Send A Coalfield Delegation to the UN
Coalfield Residents Banding Together to Save School From Impoundment
The CARTOONS - A Common Theme Emerges

THANKS

Healing Mountains: The 16th annual Heartwood Forest Council and the 6th annual Summit for the Mountains
OVECs Annual Meeting and Spaghetti Dinner Fund-Raiser
They Say Nuke Like Its a Good Thing


For viewing the PDF version of the newsletter

 

Winds of Change Newsletter, February 2006     See sidebar for table of contents

Proposed Campaign Financing Act Would Mean Clean Elections in WV

by Julie Archer

The WV Public Campaign Financing Act (S.B. 124) would create an alternative public financing option for candidates seeking election to the state Senate and House of Delegates. The system is voluntary and candidates who participate agree to abide by contribution and spending limits. Public funds would be made available to candidates in single-member districts beginning with the elections to be held in 2010, and to candidates in the remaining House districts beginning in 2012.

Public financing is an important step to reduce candidate reliance on special interest money and enable candidates who lack personal wealth or access to wealthy contributors to run a competitive campaign paving the way for ordinary citizens to have a voice in the political process.

At least six other states have already adopted full public financing programs for some or all state offices, and several others are considering similar legislation. In Maine and Arizona, the nations two pioneering clean elections states, it is now the political norm to run for office free from direct dependence on private campaign contributions.

If West Virginias legislature passes S.B. 124, candidates for the statehouse could spend more time talking about issues instead of fund-raising. They could run on the merit of their ideas.

Incumbent legislators who opt to run under this voter-owned system would be free to vote their conscience instead of feeling beholden to special interest contributors.

Public financing of elections is a sensible approach to changing the status quo and moving toward a government that is more honest, open and accountable to the needs of all its citizens, not just a select few who can afford to make big donations to candidates.

   Smart Counter Details   OVEC Home   Issues   Contact   Join   Site Map