|
||||||||
|
Winds of Change Newsletter, March 2008 See sidebar for table of contents Which Will WV Choose – Tourism or Wanton Destruction?
Since West Virginia is publicized as "wild and wonderful," and since tourism is the state’s fastest-growing industry, forgive us if we thought state officials at least believed that mountains in tourist areas are worth saving. But no! Mountaintop removal is planned in an important tourist region – the Ansted area of Fayette County, home to Hawks Nest State Park, near the Midland Trail and the famous New and Gauley Rivers, centers of West Virginia’s whitewater rafting industry. Blowing up mountains and burying streams is wrong anywhere. It is no more wrong in the Ansted area than anywhere else. But it startles us that under Gov. Manchin, even areas that are key parts of the state’s tourism business are slated to be sacrificed to the short-term profits of the coal industry. Many people from in and near Ansted are working to expose DEP’s failure in granting permits to Powellton Coal Company. The permit area for blasting away mountains would border the state park and would be visible from the New River Gorge Bridge. Will we have to change the design on the state quarter so that massacred mountains can be visible behind the bridge? Not if DEP acknowledges its failures and rescinds the permit. The list of failures includes: D Advertising the hearing on a Saturday in a different newspaper at different times, and slating the hearing for August 31, a popular high school football night and Labor Day weekend, despite several requests to change the date.D In the permit, the company stated a certain amount of rainfall in the area was considered for the drainage of the site, data contradicted by information from the Ansted Sanitary Board, which was presented by Mayor Pete Hobbs at the public hearing. This contradictory information has not been considered during the evaluation of the permittee’s NPDES application.D The DEP did not consider information given by local residents who are former miners and tunnel workers about the number of tunnels and underground mines that are impounding water. DEP permit supervisor Charles Grafton said if it was not on his map, it did not exist. He refused to go with local residents to view sites that residents feel pose a danger from flooding. The DEP and permittee have identified only one such site during the application process, but either do not know, or have refused to reveal either the depth of the mine or the amount of water in the mine.D The tape recording of the NPDES hearing was inaudible, and it is doubtful that a decision on the permit took the testimony from the hearing into account.D There were five violations on the site even before the permit was granted, four of which the DEP chose not to reveal until after the public hearing:
These violations are clearly a public endangerment. The DEP did not assess any fines against the company for these violations and did not force the company to cease and desist from mining without a permit. After a request for a citizens’ inspection in September, DEP officials in charge of the mine site apparently lied to citizens about the company’s requirement to get an NPDES, claiming that the company did not need a water pollution permit since they were not going to disturb the stream. The citizen inspectors were also told by the DEP officers that the appeal of the mining permit had been dropped, which was also untrue. DEP disregarded public testimony during the permitting process. We feel that these failures by the DEP constitute a failure to protect the public. In February, the state Surface Mine Board heard an appeal of the DEP’s permit. The board received a resolution from the Fayette County Commission asking the DEP to rescind the permit (see story page 4). The appeal hearing continues in March. For more information, please contact Abe at (304) 633-6976 or abe@ohvec.org.
|
|||||||
|
||||||||