Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition
Archive list of "E"- Notes newsletters

Click links below to read articles online, or try the PDF version to view or print an exact replica of the paper newsletter. 

Contents
Also see Web Extras

OVEC, Others Challenge Blair Mountain Mining Permit
Dont Let Area Power Plants Make Our Air Even Worse
Renewable Energy and a Renewed E-Council
Coal Expo Exposed:
Sludge is Not Safe
Coal Expo Exposed: Protesters Rally at Candlelight Vigil
Are Your US Senators and Reps Climate Champions?
Oberlin College Doing the Right Thing With Education
Bush Admin. Finalizes Mountain Massacre Study
Christians for the Mountains: Statement by Denise Giardina
Christians for the Mountains Spread Word of Responsible Earthkeeping And That Means an End to Mountaintop Removal
Massey Launches Total Environment Web Assault
Reckless Disregard: Settlement doesnt clear Massey, MSHA
Legal Victory! Judge Tosses OSM's Water Rule Approval
WV Passes Landmark Law Curbing 527 Groups
Capito Got Most
DeLay Money
Texas Congressman Kills National Renewable Energy Standard
Coal Industry Money Fuels Public Policy in West Virginia
Reports Detail
Senate Race Donors
Foxes Guarding Henhouse - Why We Need Real Campaign Finance Reform
Unclean Coal: Myth Perpetrators Get an Earful
Coal Very Costly, Not Cheap, If ALL Impacts Are Factored In
T H A N K S !
Update on Blair Mountain - Feds Want Still More Information
SouthWings Needs YOU!
WV Ranked 7th in Mercury Emissions
From Ireland to
Blair Mountain,
with Love and Lyrics
WV Singers and Songwriters Wanted for Blair Mountain Project
Rosa Parks Lights the Way
Holiday Shopping with OVEC
Students Pray for Kayford
Miscellany
Web Extras Below
Articles not in the printed newsletter
RENEWABLE FUTURE
Change or Die
Courage to Move Beyond Coal
Climate of Change: It's Easy to Save Money Being Green
Sequestration Smokescreen?
Massey settlement agreement scuttles insider trading allegations
Mining 'is turning Eastern Kentucky into a despicable latrine'
Ecoterrorism Tops the Charts
Human Activities Cause of Current Extinction Crisis
Kentucky needs study on truck weight limits
Meanwhile, elsewhere (jobs, money, renewable energy)
Mining pollution in Coal River needs drastic cut, state says
Not Nice to Wonder?
Things you can do for a better planet (while saving money!)
Where's the money for the Island Creek flood project?
Visiting Van, WV


For viewing the PDF version of the newsletter

 

Winds of Change Newsletter, December 2005     See sidebar for table of contents

Courage to Move Beyond Coal

By Bryan McNeil (excerpts)

Thank goodness a corporation with the size and influence of General Electric has taken on America's antiquated energy policies with investments and innovative plans for developing new energy sources. Corporations increasingly provide needed leadership to push America towards a forward-looking energy policy. That said, GE and others must have the courage to divert much-needed resources away from so-called clean coal technology. Coal simply is not clean and has no place in America's energy mix for the 21st century and beyond.

"Clean" coal technology sounds like a promising endeavor. Reducing smokestack emissions would go a long way towards alleviating the largest source of air pollution in the United States. But "clean" coal suffers from two critical flaws. First, it focuses only on smokestack emissions-one of many sources of pollution coal creates. Second, the politics of coal and energy have already exposed "clean" coal as a political shell game.

"Clean" coal technology works. I have seen it. After several years researching West Virginia's coal mining industry, I visited the coal-fired cogeneration plant at the University of North Carolina, where I attended graduate school. UNC's plant uses a fluidized bed furnace, a model of clean coal technology developed under a federal program from 1986 through 1993. The plant exceeds all federal standards for smokestack emissions. The plant captures over 99 percent of its particulates, 92% of its sulfur, and recycles ash that other plants often dump in landfills. UNC installed its fluidized bed furnace in 1992. In 2005 the public must ask, why hasn't this become the industry standard?

That "clean" coal technology works is completely irrelevant. Resistance to actually use existing technology while continually proclaiming the promise of coal reveals "clean" coal for what it is: a political shell game that funnels money into the pockets of coal and utility companies rather than developing projects that could wean America off of fossil fuels.

The political sleight of hand that is "clean" coal also serves to focus attention on emissions as the only source of coal's pollution Simply put, there is no "clean" way to mine coal.

Even as CEO Jeffery Immelt announced GE's new "ecomagination" project, the company aired an advertisement that is hands-down the most ridiculous thing on television. Sexy models mining coal with picks and shovels offends anyone who has mined coal and misleads viewers on how mining is done.

An underground coal mine is a place unlike any other: an eerie, damp netherworld where proud workers slosh around in ankle-deep muck. In this dimly lit environment filled with opportunities for injury and death, the only skin visible on a miner is that between safety goggles and the chin

The dirtiest secret of the coal industry at the dawn of the 21st century is that an increasing percentage of coal is not mined underground at all. In the Appalachian region, mountaintop removal has become a preferred mining methodMany mountaintop removal sites in southern West Virginia encompass 5,000 contiguous acres, making a mockery of the 1977 Surface Mine Control and Reclamation Act

Clearly, controlling smokestack emissions will do nothing to correct the myriad human and environmental tragedies associated with mountaintop removal. It will not reduce the number of miners suffering from black lung or other chronic disabilities that accompany mining. Clearly, America's dependence on coal will not end suddenly; burning coal still generates over 50% of the nation's electricity. Nevertheless, an intelligent, forward-looking energy policy must be based on weaning the nation off of coal altogether. GE or any other company should be proud to lead efforts at increasing investments in green energy. But so-called clean coal technology simply does not qualify. GE undermines its own efforts by misleading the public about mining coal. GE, industry, government and the United States at large must get real about changing energy policy and accept that nothing about coal is clean, much less sexy.

   Smart Counter Details   OVEC Home   Issues   Contact   Join   Site Map